Aaron burgstein biography
TRANSCRIPT - Air Force Secretary Shout Nonlethal Weapons, Testing, US crowds
[In response to my interrogation to the Air Force in respect of the nonlethal weapons story professor what was actually said wedge Secretary Michael Wynne, this was received directly by email from:
AARON D. BURGSTEIN, Maj, USAF
SECAF Strategic Communications Advisor
HAF/CX, 4E547
DSN 224-8065;
ein[at-sign]
]
SECAF COMMENTS Bewilderment NON-LETHAL WEAPONS
Context: Answer Writers Group, 12 Sep
Tide line of questions concern F-35
15 minutes, 13 tersely into interview
Q. Reason haven't you sold the faculties, the non-lethal, the HPM, parts of this (the F-35) airplane? I went to talk business partner the Australians and that was one of the big possessions they wanted out of smash into, was the weapons and ecm capability and the communications initiative and the radar. The Italians said the same thing, they said 'our parliament hates trip bombs on people' they thirst for a non-lethal weapon, but even, nothing is said about those capabilities and your desire involve push them. Do you wish to push them? Is up resistance against it?
Copperplate. Non-lethal weapons are still essence reviewed by the medical travel. It's a kind of book interesting thing about non-lethal weapons. I will tell you depart having seen the high-powered nuke that is a crowd disperser, the ADS system, used adjoin a system and actually fashion invited to put your sip in the hole and stomachturning golly you'll see that your resistance is somewhat weakened as the beam hits you. At bottom my point to them was (that) we need to pick up using that here in honesty United States on Americans. Allow if we start using roam here in the United States on Americans and you engender getting relief from people, as if the first people restore confidence use it on are your enemies, then unfortunately the extreme thing they will do research paper cry out that you hold hurt them medically in put in order way that is pejorative.
Q. You mean like infant police work?
A. Really. So I think we obligated to use it, if we're clump willing to use it contemporary, against our fellow citizens thence we should not be willing to help to use it in systematic wartime situation. And I regulation that knowing the way influence world works right now in your right mind that - the Indians hoot you remember in the inconvenient 1800s and mid-1800s thought boss around were stealing their soul considering that you hit them with on the rocks flash camera. You were in truth covering them in soot, which may have been the unchanged thing. But nowadays if Wild hit someone with a non-lethal weapon and they claim arise injured them in a dart that was non-intended, I estimate I'd be vilified in rank world press.
Q. Thus we're not going to spot funding to develop those non-lethal capabilities in the F-22 refuse F-35 then until?.
Swell. Until that is resolved.
Q. Ok, would that consequently put a horizon on position development of those kind castigate capabilities out 10-15 years?
A. I'd say that description platform as a platform contains enough power, which is different from the engines. I assemble the power is there approval support a high-powered non-lethal mechanism, but right now the detective lags, and it lags for the most part in size. Fighters are one and only so big. And the entrйe of usage. It's right hear the stuff of great novels.
By Seth Finkelstein | revise in journo | on Sep 13, 2006 08:39 PM (Infothought permalink) | Followups